4 Answers
I'm against the idea.
IMO, this is just as bad as giving teachers guns at school.
People who attend church are sinners, not saints. Teachers are sinners, not saints either.
I can imagine a teacher who had sex with a student and knowing he or she has been caught, making the decision to kill the student to keep him/her from talking. Why not kill all the other classmates too.
I can imagine yet another priest molesting/raping another innocent child and after knowing he's been caught also grabbing the gun (that was meant for protection) and killing his young victim/victims before turning the gun on himself.
Seriously, not every Tom, Dick, and Harry (Jane's too) are in need of a gun in his/her possession.
4 years ago. Rating: 3 | |
I know there are a lot of well-meaning people who only keep guns for protection, but
the good people (law-abiding citizens) wouldn't feel the need to have a gun for protection if the bad people (rapists, robbers, murders, etc) didn't have guns either.
If people like George Hennard, Eric Harris, Dylan Klebold, and Adam Lanza didn't have access to guns then there would not have been any mass shootings.
*If the bad guys didn't have guns then the good guys wouldn't need guns*
This is what I meant by my answer.
More people with more guns will equal more dead people! If it's okay for all citizens to have guns, why do police officers even need to be trained. Just grab a gun and anyone can be ready to protect others?
4 years ago. Rating: 1 | |