11 Answers

Why stop at two, they can afford a big family, helps to fill the rooms at their homes.

I'm happy for the two of them. I think it would be fantastic to see them have at least a couple more children. 

Congratulations to them! My concern is Kate's health, while pregnant

....Yippy !

Congratulations to Will and Kate on Baby #3...

Good for them,,now let us just move on shall we..or shall we help the media kill another princess or prince..>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<..

The British Monarchy have always tried to have several or more Prince's and Princess's, at least one would be in line for the throne if the unthinkable happened - the baby as yet unborn will be fifth in line. 

 if any thing drastic should happen,at  least one will be in line for the throne

congrats I suppose. Why not six children. That's what I always wanted. My mother had five and I can't imagine going without any of them. Losing two is a sad reminder of the fact. I think the babies are too close together but pooh. I'm just a commoner...

Ducky

I thought the timing was perfect. They'll all be two years apart I believe. Nice little family.

Ducky

I think closer together is nicer for the kids.

Congratulations to them, it's their choice. After all they have to change all the nappies, and clean up behind them , oh, I expect granny Camilla  helps when she pops in for a gin and tonic.

She needs to produce an heir and a spare.........like Princess Diana did.

country bumpkin

Princess Charlotte is the (spare) heir. She's fourth in line to the throne following after her brother George.
Good read with pictures here (enjoy)>>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/kate-middleton/11484034/family-tree-sucession.html

Ducky

This is #3 mcm.