8 Answers

If one of them did condemn the riots then most of the decent law-abiding voters of America would vote for them, wouldn't they?

DANG......... you ain't gonna win an election that way.

If Trump did he would loose many votes from the Black community. Hillary wouldn't because they all know she would be lying.

....peace in/with God is missing

I thought Trump did condemn them . One killed, well then one less democrat voting. Just shows there is consequences to ones actions.  Let them keep killing each other. Its their right to protest, so let them .

they call the riots, " protests "  b/c it sounds nicer, but where i come from , we had the Detroit riot in  ' 67 and nobody called it " a protest "  You might say it was my H.S. graduation gift. Even we, here in the suburbs, had a 8pm curfew.And Charlotte has a 12 mn curfew. They  might as well not have a curfew if it's going to be that late. 

I think law abiding citizens would welcome condemnation of riots from  a presidential candidate whether they be black or white, there will be always violence as long as the so call protesters carry weapons.

Actually, I suspect very little would happen. The presidents supporters would praise his forward thinking and his detractors would excoriate him for his hollow promises. Human nature is what it is and has been since we evolved enough to form governments. Cynical, I know, but history supports my cynicism. All we can do is continue to try and control the negative elements that are intent on corrupting  what usually start out as peaceful demonstrations. 

If they shot the guy and he did not have a gun,,peaceful rally's will always be taken over by frustration,,but as i said before, because most people in USA have a gun,,the cop wants to be the first to shoot,i would not want to be black in USA..there are good blacks and bad blacks,good whites and jumpy whites,,>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<..