9 Answers

I agree that Apple is wrong and should be forced to 'unlock' that phone. This is about killers who are no doubt part of a larger group. Learning that information is a matter of life and death....period!! 

8 years ago. Rating: 9
Comment this answer Add new comment

Maybe the U.S.Govt should stop using Apple for a while.Maybe that would make their point.

8 years ago. Rating: 8
Comment this answer Add new comment

APPLE ARE WRONG!

8 years ago. Rating: 7
Comment this answer Add new comment

Apple should comply (or else).

8 years ago. Rating: 7
Comment this answer Add new comment

....Apple has a responsibility against lawle$$ne$$ !

8 years ago. Rating: 7
Comment this answer Add new comment

Whoa guys,this is a technical world that most of us do not understand,and most of us do not have anything on our phones of interest to anybody except the tax man,,however this does have the ability..NOTE..i said 'ability",,once apple makes this software that does not exist now to enter a phone,that can possibly give access to any phone in the world.Government,military,company espionage, the list is endless,,my point is,always remember we the people are the mushrooms,so this subject is certainly a long way out from our understanding,,our normal answer is"if it saves  lives, stuff the rest of it".instead of asking will it save more lives than it will cost,,either way the decision falls,,it can be disastrous or brilliant..>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<.

8 years ago. Rating: 5
Comment this answer Add new comment

They should be made to cooperate  , and if they refuse lock em up.

8 years ago. Rating: 5
Comment this answer Add new comment

Here is the basic text of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.  I believe Apple is doing what is right; I may not like who they are protecting, but I certainly appreciate WHY they are doing so.  Do you HONESTLY trust the US Government not to abuse this "power"? 

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,^[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.^[2]

8 years ago. Rating: 3
Comment this answer Add new comment

Sorry guys but Apple is correct in protecting what they advertise. I’d like to think that any personal information I may have (though I sincerely doubt it would include human death) is protected no matter what. That’s my right as a consumer. Trust.  Sorry this includes persons that it’s ended up coverin but why would our government stop there? There has to be a line......

6 years ago. Rating: 2
Comment this answer Add new comment