11 Answers
That is a terrible painting. She looks much better than that.
11 years ago. Rating: 14 | |
I think the portrait looks like her but it is missing her youth. It looks like an older version of her. I agree with Vinny. I wonder why the artist didn't see how old she look in this painting? If Princess Kate viewed the portrait first she should have told Mr. Harris the truth and ask him to polish the painting up. Maybe that's how she looks to him.
11 years ago. Rating: 12 | |
What a bl**dy shocker the artists has made her look like she needs hair later treatment around her chin lol.. I really liked Rolf Harris portrait of the queen beats that hands down..
11 years ago. Rating: 11 | |
I hope it's stuck in your head now :P lol
I use to tell people from overseas I worked on the harbour bridge as a shoo ...
Would shoo all the kangaroos and koalas off the bridge so they didn't get hit by cars...
Tie that kangaroo down sport, no roos on the bridge :)
I like the latter two. She looks more real. I can't imagine her ever being queen.....
11 years ago. Rating: 9 | |
Tower by now!;-)
Wow, that is disappointing. She photos as a beautiful, vibrant, intelligent enough woman with a twinkle in her eye, some mischief lurking behind. That portrait looks like a tired woman with too many kids, too much laundry to do, and an abusive hubby (if he's even still around). Too bad.
11 years ago. Rating: 6 | |