close
    Newspaper that published gun owner map now using armed guards!

    Dolts! They put so many lives at risk by publishing that map but though it was still OK to do because making gun owners akin to criminals was their civic duty. Now look who turns to guns for self protection! HA! All the anti gun people should stop buying their paper now that they are OK'ing guns for their own protection. All gun owners should continue to boycott them for publishing the names and addresses of law abiding citizens with legally registered guns!  They still plan on publishing more names and addresses. Idiots. Some of those gun owners may have a gun to protect them self from an abusive ex or stalker. The criminals now have a road map to those they might be looking for, to those with a gun safe with guns in it and to those who's homes are not protected by a gun. 


    ""


     


     


    (UPI) - A New York newspaper that drew nationwide anger after publishing gun-permit holders' names and addresses is now protected by armed guards, the publisher said.
    The increased security at The Journal News, which covers the lower Hudson Valley just north of New York City, comes as the newspaper promised to forge ahead with plans to expand its interactive map of pistol-permit holders to include a third county.


    It also comes amid a several-hour scare at the newspaper's White Plains office when an envelope containing a suspicious white powder arrived in the mail.


    Local officials said they determined the substance in the envelope was not a threat.


    The Gannett Co. newspaper published an article Dec. 23 titled "The Gun Owner Next Door: What You Don't Know About the Weapons in Your Neighborhood" after the mass school shooting in nearby Newtown, Conn., that left 20 children and six adult staffers dead.


    The article was accompanied online by an interactive map showing a database of pistol-permit holders in Westchester and Rockland counties (tinyurl.com/agvla2p).


    The newspaper has been criticized for publishing the data, which it obtained legally through the state's Freedom of Information Law.


    Others said they felt the report shed light on the presence of legally permitted guns in their communities.


    Officials in Putnam County, the third county whose pistol-permit holders the newspaper wants to publish, said they would hold a noon EST Thursday news conference announcing their refusal to release the records.


    Republican State Sen. Greg Ball, whose district is in Putnam County, told Fox News Channel Wednesday he would be at the news conference and urged local readers to "cancel their [Journal News] subscriptions."


    He cited a hypothetical domestic-violence victim who filed for a pistol permit for self-protection.


    "Now that nutjob can show up at your door, courtesy of the Journal News," Ball, a former U.S. Air Force lieutenant, said, adding the list publication "has backfired in their face."


    "Now a robber has a Christmas shopping list," he told Fox News.


    Wall Street Journal columnist James Taranto, a member of the newspaper's editorial board, wrote he did "not begrudge The Journal News for exercising its Second Amendment right to armed self-defense. But doing so after attacking law-abiding citizens for doing exactly the same thing is the most stunning display of media hypocrisy we've seen since the 'civility' frenzy of early 2011."


    Rockland County legislators plan to hold a news conference Friday to announce a resolution condemning publication of the gun information.


    Robert Freeman, executive director of the state government's Committee on Open Government, said Putnam officials would be breaking the law if they refused to release the records.


    "The name and address of any gun licensee are public," he told The Journal News.


    "In my opinion, there is not a lot of room for interpretation," he added to The New York Times.


    Freeman said the newspaper could appeal the denial, first to the county government and then, if necessary, to a judge.


    He cited a precedent in which The Wall Street Journal asked New York City officials to turn over gun data. The request was denied and the state's highest court later ruled in favor of the Journal, he said.

    +1  Views: 1271 Answers: 3 Posted: 11 years ago
    bulletman

    BLAH! BLAH! BLAH!

    3 Answers

    THIS IS JUST AN INDICATION of other infringements on our privacy that are forthcoming in the USA.

    itsmee

    Partly through social media the USA is becoming a small town.
    Bob/PKB

    ........masquerading as news and truth.....

    One of the ccw permit holders should now post the addresses of all the aint-gun people responsible for that publication.  let the gun owners see where these people live.. Put a real scare into them, under the 1st admendment right, they should have equal rights to do the same. 


    Anti gun peeps are the real nut cases.  Here is ca there a bill on the floor to eliminate the sale us bullets for these guns that cause paranoia amongst the ignorant.  So stupid, these 'bad' people with guns buy them illegally and they will do the same with bullets.


    BTW: Last night in San Francisco, a guy threw gasoline on his girlfriend and set her afire.  so, what do we do?? Ban gasoline? ban gas cans?? ban matches and lighters?? or really get to the source and ban fire...  So stupid..

    Colleen

    Moderator
    I agree. I've said it right along. What's fair is fair. List all the homes without a gun to protect property. That truly are ignorant. I can see this causing more crimes now that the criminals have a road map the the homes without a gun in the area. I've also said right along, if someone wants to kill, they will find a way to kill. If they want to do a mass killing, they will find a way to do that too. Gun not required.
    itsmee

    Good saying, Vinny. Your comment on banning fire was great.
    Vinny

    Yeah, Fire is about a smart as a gun, fire kills people, They want to scold guns by banning them, kinda like beating a dead horse. makes absolutely no sense. I love listening to the reasoning behind this, it's getting really old. For some reason, they are convinced that banning guns will keep the criminals from acquiring guns, when in fact, it makes their criminally activity easier and safer for them as only good people (victims) will be the ones without guns. I don't own a gun per-say- Just a pellet pistol and matched derringers in presentation case. (collector) but I strongly support those that want to keep guns for hobby/sport/protection. I also agree that weapons of rapid autofire (machine guns) have no need in society. JMO

    Yes , but only the really dumb ones with a death wish would rob a house if they knew the owner was armed . I think its funny the several ones crying why their names were not on the list , they want the criminals to know they are armed and waiting for them in the dark.

    Colleen

    Moderator
    I'm looking at it from the perspective of they only have to wait for the owner to go to work. As for the ones wanting their names on the list, they would more than likely end up having to save their non gun owning neighbors.
    zorro

    correct


    Top contributors in Other - News & Events category

     
    Benthere
    Answers: 7 / Questions: 0
    Karma: 1695
     
    country bumpkin
    Answers: 17 / Questions: 0
    Karma: 1605
     
    ROMOS
    Answers: 21 / Questions: 0
    Karma: 1545
     
    Tommyh
    Answers: 14 / Questions: 0
    Karma: 1530
    > Top contributors chart
    466729
    questions
    722283
    answers
    785819
    users