9 Answers
It's not neccessay. It's a cultural thing. If a mother teaches her son to wash the head of his penis, up under the skin, then he's not in danger of getting an infection or cancer of the penis. Niether my dad nor my late husband were circumcised, and they were ok in that department.It I had a son, there's no way I would let him be circ'ed. They don't give the baby ANY local anesthetic when they cut off the skin. :-(
12 years ago. Rating: 10 | |
Ditto, when I asked this of a paediatrician when my son was born he likened it to the removal of one of his toes, "what's the point" he explained, I am aware that for a minority this has been performed later in life for medical conditions, but they are the minority, for some it's for religious reasons (some countries still also believe in female circumcision)
12 years ago. Rating: 10 | |
Apparently Jewish women have a lower rate of cervical cancer which may be due to their husbands being circumcised. Also AIDS is less prevalent among African women whose partners are circ'd.Sometimes it is performed as the foreskin is too tight, in fact my wife's ex-husband had it done for this reason and said sex was much better as a result. At one time almost all American boys were circ'd as a mark of a matriarchal society.
12 years ago. Rating: 7 | |
Uncircumsised requires much more attention to cleanliness, as the foreskin needs to be pulled back and the exposed skin cleaned thoroughly. Without the foreskin, cleansing is considerably easier and likely more thorough.
It is generally a choice, but sometimes becomes necessary. I am speaking from firsthand experience.
I seriously doubt parents are thinking about the future sexual benefits of the procedure when their sons are circumcised.
12 years ago. Rating: 2 | |