2 Answers
This is a complicated question and a very good one. Quite often situations evolve that when examiined seem to indicate a particular event or incident caused the situation to develop. That is causation. However, sometimes upon closer examination the evidence indicates that the origional reason thought to be the cause wasn't correct and that the event and the situation merely shared a relationship. Ocassionally, there are multiple relationships that share in the cause. The problem is that causation and correlation can be easily confused. For example, in global warming is man the cause of the problem or is there simply a relationship among many others. Man, I think I gave myself a headache.
13 years ago. Rating: 0 | |
Top contributors in Uncategorized category
Unanswered Questions
gfdddddddddddd
Answers: 0
Views: 6
Rating: 0
vn88companyyy
Answers: 0
Views: 10
Rating: 0
sunwinvntv
Answers: 0
Views: 9
Rating: 0
Top 8+ Most Reputable Bookmakers in Vietnam and Asia
Answers: 0
Views: 8
Rating: 0
aNY LINKS FOR GAMING FILE LIKE THOSE
Answers: 0
Views: 8
Rating: 0
vlxxhotxyz
Answers: 0
Views: 11
Rating: 0
Trải nghiệm cá cược tuyệt vời tại GO88 – Cơ hội thắng lớn ngay hôm nay!
Answers: 0
Views: 12
Rating: 0
win79uscom
> More questions...
Answers: 0
Views: 18
Rating: 0
I know, I don't how I managed to make such a convoluted explanation. I should have made it simple and said if two systems share a relationship but neither caused the other to evolve then it's correlation, but if one of the systems was responsible for the other being created or changed then it's causation.